Welcome

  • Welcome to LuxuryClues.com-THE blog for real estate agents who represent the most luxurious properties in the world. Whether you're an experienced veteran or an eager newbie, we'll help you learn what's hot and what's not in the upper echelons. Our posts include timely training tips, updates on the statistics you need to know, as well as strategies for providing the stellar service ultra wealthy clients require. Here's where to look for the cool threads that you'll want to use everyday.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    Twitter Updates

      follow me on Twitter

      « Canada | Main | Who Was the Most Photographed Person at Real Estate Connect? »

      July 29, 2008

      Comments

      Mark Bloomfield

      Bernice. Thanks for the post. I have one question for you. You indicated that one "positive" attribute of the system is that it would promote lower offers from buyers that would get the negotiation rolling. Did you mean higher offers? It seems that buyers who are required to enter into a binding agreement (with escrow) are more likely to commit to a lower offer since they no longer control the outcome if the seller accepts. On N-Play, the psychology may work just the opposite, a buyer may be willing to offer a slightly higher price than they otherwise would under a binding arrangement since they are not bound and are attempting to illicit a positive response from the seller. Low offers get no responses. After a while, why waste your time. Binding offers get a response, but more often than not....not a positive one...which creates challenging negotiations. It remains to be seen what will actually occur, but transparency and nonbinding may have the opposite affect on buyers that one would think. I would like to know your thoughts on this.

      Dear Mark,

      You're absolutely right! Thank you for the thoughtful response!

      The comments to this entry are closed.